India Politics

Is necessary hue and cry over the arrest and remand of Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal?

By  our Special Correspondent

Thrissur, March 23 (IVC)  Is it necessary  for making such a hue and cry over  the  arrest and  remand  in custody  of Enforcement Directorate, Delhi Chief  Minister, Arvind Kejriwl?

                Kejriwal was arrested on March 21 evening  and was remanded on March 22  in the custody  of the ED for six days till March 28 at 1400 hours.

                The  contentions of the opposition parties were that it  was the violation of fundamental rights and the law of the land. The  pertinent question arose in this regard was that the Delhi Chief Minister was exempted from the law of the land ? The  Enforcement  Directorate   had issued nine summonses to the Delhi Chief Minister.

and  he ignored all of them like  grass.  He  was arrested when  the Honorable Delhi  High  Court dismissed  his  petition  for  protection   of law and from the arrest.  The  Delhi  High court  observed  that  Kejriwal   had  blatantly  defied the summonses from  ED  to appear before it  and take evidence on the charges framed on him.

                The question that why  Kejriwal did not  respond to   all  the summonses remains answerless?

                If a chief  minister  of a state itself defied the law of the land , then who  will obey  the  law of the land  and how the rule of law could be  operated?  It  is  the  pertinent question asked among  the  common  man.

                The  Special Judge (Prevention of  Corruption Act)  Kaveri Baweja  of  the  Rouse  Avenue Courts asked  on March 22 for  Kejriwal to be  produced  before  her on March 28 at  1200 hours.,  when  the  six  day  remand  ended  on  an  ED plea  seeking  for  ten  days custody  in  the  case.

                The  Additional  Solicitor  General,  S V  Raju representing  the  ED submitted   before  the  court  that  Kejriwal  was  the  key  conspirator in  the excise  policy  scam. 

                ED  also  submitted   that  the   proceeds of crime  could  go  beyond Rs  100  crore  estimated  earlier  and exceeded Rs  600  crore.

                The  Delh  Chief  Minister willfully  neglected all  the  nine  summonses  issued  to  him  in this  regard,  ED submitted  before  the  court.

                The  rule  of  law  in  the  country  was being   operated  on  the  universally   acknowledged principles  such as  “Be you ever  so  high, the  law  is  above you” –  Thomas Fuller   and “Be  you  ever  so  high, the  law  is  higher  than you”- Lord  Dunnings. Besides, Article  14  of  the Constitution  of  Indi says  “ Equality  before  the  law and equal  protection  of  the  laws”  for  all.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *