India

Good-bye to the 164-year-old British Legislation

By Adv  C K George*

Thrissur, June  30  (IVC)    The  Indian Penal Code (IPC)  passed by the British Parliament in 1 860 by  the  British  Parliament would be ceased  to function  from July 01, 2024  and  the Bharatiya   Nyaya Sanhita  (BNS) 2023  would  be  in vogue  in the country  since  July 2024.

                According to  senior legal  PR actioners like  Adv Kaleeswaram Raj,  BNS  is also  not hunky-dory at  all. IPC was  long  overdue for  repeal not only  of  its antiquity  and anachronism  but   of its certain strange  sections like 124A (Sedition) and 309 (Attempt  to commit suicide).  It  was only section  warranted for punishment  in the IPC  for  one  attempting  to commit  suicide for simple  imprisonment for  one  year or fine  or  both.

                Several  years  back in the UK the  profounder of IPC, attempt  to commit suicide   was  removed  from the  list  of  offences and in India is still an offence.

                IPC was the only  legislation in the whole  of the Anglo-Saxon Jurisdiction  that  it  was kept  in the cold-storage for  24  years  for  its  enactment. The  First Law Commission of  India was  constituted  in 1834  with  Lord  Thomas Babington Macaulay  for  preparing  a  penal  code  for  India. 

                Macaulay  sat for  three years  behind  high  walls  completely  disconnected  from the  people  for  whom  he  was  ostensibly  working  for  and  created a code  of  criminal  code which was a “body of  jurisprudence  written for everyone and  no  one.  It  had  no  relationship  to  previous Indian  laws and any  other  form of Government  at  all”.

                Even the British  authorities  were  uncertain  about  his efforts and their efficacy and it sat unenacted  for long  24 years .  Macaulay   finished   his  work  on the IPC  in 1837  and  it  was  enacted  by  the  British  Parliament in 1860.  It  is still largely  in force in all  its  Victorian glory.

                It  was  said  that Macaulay  wwas not  in talking terms with his  wife though they stayed in the same mansion.  Certain sections  of the IPC had suffered  their distance  i.e. when his wife passed in front of him  that  section harsh  treatment  like  Section  309 of the  IPC.

                The  several  sections  in the IPC , the  punishment prescribed was either  simple imprisonment  or rigorous imprisonment  as Macaulay  was scrutinizing these section when  his wife went in front of him.                 The  Bharatiya  Nagrik  Suraksha Sanhita 2023 (CrPC)  and Bharatiya  Sakshya  Adhiniyam  _______________________2023 (Indian Evidence Act)  would  also  be  enforced  since  July 01, 24.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *